George Rebane
Too bad that The Union has erected a paywall around its online edition that also includes their op-ed pages. Usually newspapers going to that source of revenue leave their op-ed pieces as free content so that it will attract more eyeballs, and in the process help sell 'premium content' that’s behind the paywall. In any case, more people would see some ads on the newspaper’s startpage. But I’m sure that publisher Jeff Ackerman and the people at Swift Communications used some pretty sharp pencils to puzzle out the net dollars and cents of this decision. In any event, I hope it works out well for their bottom line.
Nevertheless, I have a lament about that paywall. You see a Penn Valley gentleman named Fred Perry wrote an Other Voices piece – Re: ‘Devil in democracy', by George Rebane – in today’s (21jan12) Union. And I’d like all RR readers to be able to read Mr Perry’s contribution. I was intrigued that his response to my 14jan12 column ‘The Devil in Democracy’ called for an even longer reply. But its reading made clear that the response could be construed to also support the upcoming ‘teach-in’ against the ‘Citizens United’ ruling by SCOTUS. The Union has recently been giving that event all the support they could wish for.
Reading Mr Perry’s tortured arguments to counter what he thought I had said is in itself an education in miscommunications and who knows what else. (Made doubly difficult for the Union reader due to no link to my original piece.) For example the man completely missed my strong commendation of our republic and Constitution, as off the starting blocks he criticizes my offering no alternatives to naked democracy. From there he departs on a meandering journey of fabricating propositions not raised in my piece, to which he then proceeds to offer disjointed counter arguments. While I am pleased that his reading of my piece motivated such a literary outpouring, perhaps a rereading would have better focused his objections onto the topic that I discussed. Then again, maybe not.
[24jan2012 update] For the record I make available here a more detailed response to Mr Perry's energetic attempt at criticizing my Union column. The pdf is Mr Perry's article annotated with my comments.
Our Mobile Politicians
George Rebane
Now I’m not against anyone trying to make a good living and seek advancement in their profession. No shame, no blame in all these moves. But it does occur to me that we should bear such machinations in mind when we encounter and then decide to support our elected politicians. Traditionally, since our school days these people have been presented to us as individuals of extraordinary abilities and character. After all, when elected they become explicitly honorable and indicate that by appending ‘The Honorable …’ to their titles and names.
Our California Assemblyman Dan Logue just announced that he “changed his mind” and will no longer represent us. He is moving out of our community – into which he moved just last year – to another city in another assembly district. This makes sense for him when he considers his longer term prospects in politics. Politicians make these moves on a regular basis. Our congressman Tom McClintock is a transplant from southern California where it was harder for him to get into Congress. And our state senator Doug LaMalfa is abandoning his California seat for a try at the House of Representatives this November. Musical chairs to the max.
This feeling, or should I say aura, comes from our democratic roots. In thousands of communities across the country, we imagine ourselves having always gathered together to discuss our local concerns, and then joining to select ‘one of us’ to run for high office. And then, with our blessings and good wishes, to go off into some capitol to do battle in our behalf. Those elected have always been viewed as ‘our people’ with roots that entwine with ours, roots that go deeper into our soil and past than the new comer just off the stage upon whom we instinctively fix our gimlet eye. But this is far from today’s reality as defined by ever shifting district lines, mass communications, rapid travel, multiple residences, and easy moves.
Here today, they all promise to bear our standard into the long fight – we must recall that every politician heralds intimate knowledge of our community and long tenure in complex legislatures as a part his strong suit for re-election – you just can’t send anyone ‘up there’. But tomorrow better opportunity beckons, and off they go. So in this day and age, how are we supposed to deport ourselves as we nervously finger our checkbooks when deciding whether to put our money where their mouths are?
Posted at 10:52 AM in California, Culture Comments, Current Affairs, Happenings | Permalink | Comments (14) | TrackBack (0)