George Rebane
[This is autobiographical sketch recounts the Rebane family’s entrance into the post-war world of displaced persons just after the war ended in Germany, and before the ‘final disposition’ of the east European refugees would stabilize. We and thousands like us were still in mortal danger of being forcefully ‘repatriated’. This was to be our second escape from Augsburg.
The chronological order of these sketches and their links are listed below. They and other related travels are assembled in the My Story section of RR. Background on Estonia and stories from my earlier years during the war are marbled into the series 'Road Ruminations' written during our June 2008 return trip to Estonia.]
‘Christmas in Stettin – 1944’ , ‘The Last Train from Stettin’ , ‘1945 – The year Easter was cancelled’ , ‘The War Ends in Liederberg’ , ‘Sixty years ago today – 4 May 1949’
This piece follows the events described in ‘The War Ends in Liederberg’. The upcoming story of the Geislingen Displaced Persons Camp years will conclude the pre-America phase of my life.]
Our ride south from Liederberg in the back of the Army ¾ ton truck ended in Augsburg, the war devastated city where in 1518 Martin Luther was examined for heresy and escaped northward in the dead of night. Within two weeks of the war’s end on 8 May 1945, the western allies established a series of collection points – it was too early yet to call them actual camps – for the hundreds of thousands of east Europeans who were lucky enough to find themselves west of the Red Army when the bullets stopped flying. Vello, Ellen, and their son Jüri Rebane were among the very fortunate – or were they?
An apology for all occasions
George Rebane
[In my long working career I was privileged and very lucky to have worked with and under some truly remarkable and very smart people. One of these was an older systems engineer extraordinaire and a complete gentleman by the name of Skip Case. I was technically his peer, but I never considered myself as such. In a number of different ways Skip taught all of us who worked with him. Those who also bothered to learn, benefitted from his wisdom.
Skip died a few years back, a little before I started RR, and was then only occasionally posting on the SESF website. When I heard the news, it hit me that over the decades I and several others had been profitably using a phrase that he taught us years ago. To remember Skip, I wrote the following vignette and posted it on the SESF website. My most recent use of the phrase in a comment recalled the vignette, and I retrieved it to share with RR readers. You may also find it useful some day, especially in the heated discussions of complex issues we cover here.]
Skip Case RIP
George Rebane – 21 May 2007
The conference room was crowded with the company’s elite engineering talent and top management for a very important system design review meeting. The decision taken today would impact the company’s standing and future role as the nation’s leading nuclear submarine combat systems developer and manufacturer. In 1968 as a young hotshot engineer I was privileged to be included in that tense gathering of greats in a very secretive industry critical to the country’s well-being, yet almost completely and purposefully unknown to the outside world. On board every operational fleet ballistic missile and attack submarine of our Navy, our company’s systems were the ones that would likely fire the opening salvos of WW3.
One of the company’s senior project engineers had just completed a presentation of an important design concept on which the effectiveness of the new system would hinge. He was a man in his late forties of small yet lithe stature and thinning neatly combed hair. What especially distinguished Skip’s presence was his gaze – he had the most focused and level gaze which when turned on you established an intellectual connection that would bind like a taught rope. Using the fewest words needed, Skip always spoke precisely and with a calm urgency that made the listener want to lean forward in his chair so as not to miss a single pearl.
Engineering, as a demanding technical profession, is often a ruthless forum in which mistakes and errors are pounced upon by peers for ego gratification, reputation enhancement, and generally counting coup. Such critiques are most often spontaneous but sometimes, especially when corporate management will be present, they are planned ambushes of great sophistication. That morning a mid-level division manager with a short career as a practicing engineer rose to deliver a withering critique of the just concluded presentation. It was obviously a long-planned critique that had still been in deep rehearsal while Skip was talking. And it was apparent to us all that he had not understood the very essence of the design approach. As he concluded with a knowing glance to the company’s chief technical officer (Chief Engineer in those days), all eyes turned to Skip.
Remaining seated with hands folded, Skip fixed his attacker in that signature gaze and, with incredible calm and no hint of sarcasm, said,
“I’m sorry, I didn’t say it well enough for you to understand.”
… and paused. As the semantic impact of this simple sentence settled in our minds most of us were astounded. I remember scrambling to record those words in my notebook and I wasn’t alone. The managerial upstart was dumbfounded, he didn’t know on whom those contrite words put blame or shame. He wanted to strike back, but no obvious target had been presented. While his would-be nemesis was so consternated, Skip proceeded to quickly correct the man’s error and the meeting went on to a productive conclusion.
In his wisdom Skip Case settled a potentially contentious and divisive situation with a sentence that allowed everyone to draw their own distinct yet proper meaning of the occasion depending on their position and perspective. All of us left the room with those words in mind. I was fortunate to count Skip as one of my mentors and to sit at his knee during those early years. And since that time I also have learned to apologize when I could not say it well enough for my respondent to understand – but still not as well as Skip.
Posted at 02:38 AM in Culture Comments, My Story, The Rear View | Permalink | Comments (5) | TrackBack (0)