George Rebane
Some people maintain that it is only the ignorant, mostly minority populated congressional districts that send similarly endowed idiots to represent them in Congress. A poster child for this thesis is the notorious Maxine Waters who recently and inadvertently blurted out the Democrats’ intent to socialize the country (video here). I contend that this one-sided view is in error. Here is an example from C-SPAN of the sleazebag John Murtha serving as speaker pro-tempore during a session of the House of Representatives. Murtha comes from a mainly white district in Pennsylvania. Idiots and sleazebags are voted in by constituencies of all races and intellectual acumens. Their common denominator is simply hopeful greed that makes voters think they will be getting the something for nothing that their candidates promise.
And here we all thought that Senator Ben Nelson (D-Neb) was standing on principle while holding out his vote on Harry Reid’s version of Obamacare. (Well, not all of us.) The honorable senator finally sailed into friendly waters under a federal guarantee to fund Nebraska’s Medicaid programs at more favorable rates. Reid has been at this tit for tat payola game with a number of equally honorable senators who know how to play ‘The Price is Right’.
More Taxes = More Democracy. Under various guises, this is the mantra that most liberal members of Congress have been reciting to us for decades. Now they may have a new leg to stand on. Two French researchers (guess of what political hue) have run some numbers and conclude (here) that countries with higher tax rates are more democratic. The astute reader immediately recalls that most tyrannies are named ‘Democratic Republic’ of this or that, and all claim very high voter turnouts to support their single party/ideology systems. The authors of the study are very careful not to confuse democracy with individual liberty, and neither should we.
Finally, we note that Al Gore beat out the late Irena Sendler for the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize. Al Gore gave a slide show on the growing hokum of anthropogenic global warming. Ninety-eight year-old Irena Sendler (pictured) was also nominated. She saved thousands of Jewish children by smuggling them out of the Warsaw ghetto until caught. I would like to think that fifty years from now both will still be remembered for what they respectively did to and for humanity. In this Christmas season, get inspired and google Irena Sendler. (Hat tip to RR reader.)
Ruminations - 15dec2009
George Rebane
The hard left blog Truthout.com reports (here) on the formation and activities of March Forward!. MF is a disgruntled veterans group that asks all active duty military to join and protest the mid-east conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan. MF considers them illegal military adventures and urges military personnel to refuse their mid-east assignments. Such groups have arisen during most of America’s conflicts. But wholesale mutiny seems to me to be a desperate stratagem to apply at this point in our war against militant Islam.
The Toronto Sun end runs our MSM with the detailed report of how the CRU’s temperature dataset archives’ management and the subsequent software for estimating historical temperatures were “botched”. And this from one of their own software engineers charged with trying to come up with the politically correct temperature record. It is an ongoing joke how the know-nothing MSM and the White House continue to spin all this as inconsequential. I guess they have given up on the tack that ‘botched’ is just normal jargon which scientists use to report progress and success to one another.
For a complete update on what’s really happening at the big climate change conference in Copenhagen, please visit the Heritage Foundation’s site here. The big Kahunas of the developed world will converge there in a day or two for the purpose of signing something that looks like a consensus. Right now it appears they will not be able to cobble anything together that is too damaging to the world and its economies. The poor countries are miffed (aka pissed) that they won’t be getting the expected big bucks from the rich countries to reduce their CO2 emissions or stuff in Swiss bank accounts. Am I the only one who doesn’t understand what is the basis for the so-called “negotiations” with the poor countries – what will/can they do if they don’t get the money they want. And how does it matter?
Whole Foods Republicans? In the 14dec09 WSJ, Michael Petrilli of Stanford’s Hoover Institution exhorts that Republicans need “to enlist voters who embrace a progressive lifestyle but not progressive politics”. RR readers know that most of the time I think that the sharp minds from Hoover, Heritage, and Cato do give the appearance of walking on water. But Dr. Petrilli definitely got his socks wet when writing this piece. To regain and hold the national pulpit, the GOP needs to come up with a real strategy for putting under-educated and un-educable people to work in fulfilling, quality of life sustaining jobs (example here). Merely repainting the elephant to look more like a donkey sounds like a difficult and unsustainable bamboozle to me.
Finally, why don’t socialists and leftwingers like those labels? From the comment threads on this and other blogs across the country, socialists and leftwingers consider being so identified equivalent to being called a bad name, instead of just labeling their ideological bent. My fellow ideologues and I don’t mind being labeled conservatives, libertarians, free marketers, rightwingers, and such – we bear those appellations proudly. Is it that in their heart of hearts our left-leaners know collectivism has a sorry history in its application, and that they would rather slip in their current new and improved version of it before we notice its pedigree?
Posted at 01:27 PM in Culture Comments, Current Affairs, Our Country, Our World | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack (0)