Hardwiring the Right and Left

George Rebane

In my technology newsletters I recently encountered some buzz about clinical evidence differentiating the brainbones of liberals and conservatives – in short, you may be one or the other because that’s the way you’re wired up.  There has been a flurry of articles posted on the original research done on this thesis at the University College London – here is an example report, ‘Liberal vs. Conservative: Does the Difference Lie in the Brain?'

Please note that the research is early stage, the sample size is small, and what characteristic attributes it identifies in the opposing ideologues is a reach.  For example, “liberals tend to be better at managing conflicting information, while conservatives are thought to be better at recognizing threats, …”.  This has been enthusiastically translated by some light thinking progressives to mean that ‘liberals can better handle uncertainty, and conservatives are driven by fear’.  Sweet.

These same worthies never stop to think that it is the collectivist left that has always sought to eliminate uncertainty in society.  They have exerted their beliefs and tendencies in this direction throughout the full spectrum of human activity – from comprehensive over-regulation at the state level, to the elimination of teeter-totters from playgrounds at the local level.  The last thing a leftist will tolerate is the uncertainty that comes with allowing people ‘too many’ individual liberties.  Such liberties are definitely a fearful thing to be managed with all the power the state can muster.

On the other hand it is the conservative who promotes social environments that are the most unfettered, exposing individuals to all manner of risk.  It is the rightwinger who wants the freedom to be an entrepreneur, to throw his savings into a new start-up come what may.  All such ideologues ask for is an ample measure of individual freedom, and a small government that mostly stays out of the way and out of people’s lives.  These folks thrive on the possibilities that uncertainty provides, they are the true creators and demand few guarantees from life.

Now I’m not denying that our brains may be differently wired.  In fact, in these pages I have outlined such radical differences in worldviews between the conservative and collectivist, that a physiological basis may be the simplest explanation for them (recall Occam and all that).  The perverse interpretation outlined above plays right into and illustrates such a possibility.

In the end, we should not leave this little expose by accusing the scientists involved in the research of any premature conclusions.  The principal investigator, Dr Ryota Kanai, “qualifies the findings of his own study, acknowledging that political orientation is complex, and can fall into more than just two categories. In addition, the study doesn't answer whether brain structure influences political preferences or vice versa: it's possible that the shape of the brain changes over time with a person's experiences — and with his or her changing political views.”

Comments

[Larry Wirth]

C'mon, George, it's a well known fact that children of liberals are implanted with a large Marxochip shortly after birth. This is why, if you look into one of their ears, you can no longer see the sunlight entering the other. Conservative skulls lack the necessary empty space to accomodate the chip.

[Jack McClure:]

I'd like to add my voice to this discussion. Can anyone tell me what our local far left bloggers have done to improve the lives of those in our community? Are they on the boards of the Red Cross, the Food Bank, Hospice or others. Sure, they are on the Ecoofacists boards trying to save a worm or other slimy creature. But where are they helping people directly. Where is something positive to enrich the lives of people that they have proposed or done? They complain and whine and moan and propose nothing positive. It's not that their brains have been wired differently, it's that they haven't grown since they got out of the womb. They sit in the dark in their underwear ponding out hate on their computers. They probably can't even hold a job. They are losers. Not very complex, is it?

[George Foster]

the technical term for this liberal condition is "cognitive dissonance."

[wmartin]

After reading through the Diaz posts, and the ensuing hen party concerning IP, movie theatres, and the like, I began wondering about Right vs. Left political brains.

I honestly can't say that I've been struck by 'fear' as being a differentiator. The Global Warming Wars are a good example where the shoe is on the other foot and given the tendency for the Left to be more oriented towards females and gracile males, it seems a bit of a stretch generally.

There really is some sort of odd, deep logic at work here, though. For analyzing yourself, it seems pretty straightforward. I think that most politically oriented people will hear a provably wrong statement by either side and react quite differently given the source. Something absurd from the Right, for example, might make your blood pressure go up quite a few point, while something crazy from the Left might be brushed off as a charming eccentricity.

In fact, I'd say that the words matter less than the messenger. It's fairly obvious, for example, that GWB's body language, accent, and mannerisms make some people bonkers. He could have been reading the dictionary out loud and a subset of the population would be seething. On the other hand, there's something about the East Coast professional and moneyed classes (and I'll include Chicago as being an honorary member in this case) that set another group off.

This tribalism business is serious stuff. It's hard to pin down, but ignore it at your peril.