George Rebane
Just for the record, I don’t want any RR reader to be bamboozled by the bilge water that the administration and Dems are trying to float on raising of the debt limit issue. The word from the progressives, abetted by Bernanke and Geithner, is that if the debt limit is not raised this May, then America will default on its debt service, and the world will sink into financial chaos. This is absolute bull crap floating in bilge water.
1. The feds pull in over two trillion a year in taxes, etc.
2. The US currently owes north of $14T which requires around $450B in annual debt service costs.
3. With the current authorized debt limit of about $14.3T, we can still roll over debt and borrow to that level.
4. Instead of defaulting on debt (and causing all that “chaos”) we can always pay our debt service out of current federal receipts - how? By reducing the size of government along with the entitlement payments we make to our own citizens.
5. No foreign/private lender needs to be stiffed, they will continue to get their interest payments regular as clockwork. The overdue pain we cause ourselves will not concern our foreign or domestic creditors.
6. Given the demonstrated discipline of NOT increasing the debt limit, foreign lenders will feel more, not less, confident in continuing to lend at our current debt limit. The chances of getting their principal back would just go through the roof, instead of sinking into the mud.
7. The politicians who have been lying to the voters about being able to afford current entitlement programs and solving the problem with taxing the bejeezus out of the ‘rich’ will be out on their collective butts, and have to get real jobs or sign up for transfer payments.
So in the coming weeks, when we hear the socialists scream about ‘playing Russian roulette with the nation’s future’ and ‘putting the debt burden on the backs of the poor’, stand up and tell your electeds that you too know how to do the arithmetic of debt service and debt financing the country. Defaulting on our debt service is not tied to what we do on raising the debt limit or not. But it is tied to a certain political class hoping that you’ll drink the bilge water that they are serving up while you’re too busy to pay attention.
PS. For the aficionados, listen very carefully to what Bernanke and Geithner say about debt limit and defaulting. Neither claims that refusing to raise the debt limit will cause problems. Each only states a likely result of financial turmoil IF the US doesn’t make its debt service payments. Both are counting that you will unthinkingly connect the wrong dots, and conclude that chaos is automatically linked to what Congress does on the debt limit in May. But then, you all knew that.
[update] As if we rehearsed it, Standard & Poor’s this morning changed its outlook to “negative” on America’s ability to repay its debts (WSJ report here). It isn’t so much that our economy still can support such repayments, it’s that we will not get our political act together in time to save the economy from its inevitable fate as we continue to borrow in the trillions into the indefinite future. S&P simply says that it sees no evidence that we will make meaningful progress toward solving our fiscal crisis, and therefore advises us to standby for having our AAA credit rating reduced – and that’s only the first step.
RR readers know when this happens our debt service costs will start soaring as interest rates go up. For some time now someone around here has been musing about shorting government debt instruments – oh yes, c’est moi.
By not raising the debt limit then you are absolutely right. The debt is paid first by law if I am not mistaken. Then the amount of that debt has to be trimmed from the bills which then lowers the deficit. The Republicans would have a double victory of common sense and I don't think the American people would hold anything but admiration for their gutsy move.
Posted by: Todd Juvinall | 18 April 2011 at 06:31 AM
Reminds me of a family in debt beyond their means. 2 kids both go to private school with after school activities, mom drives a new SUV, dad commutes to Sac in his Lexus sedan. Both vehicles are financed. Mom is a clothes horse and dad likes his big boy toys. The're barely above water on their home loan, but struggle to make the $4200/mo payment. They eat out a lot, or have take-out sent to their home. Their many credit cards are nearly maxed out but they make the minimum payments.
Realizing they are faced with mounting debt, instead of changing their extravigant lifestyles, they chose to apply for another credit card, increase their debt and temporarily get them selves over the hump.
Posted by: Dave C | 18 April 2011 at 07:07 AM
Our country desperately needs a leader.
I attending a showing of Atlas Shrugged part 1 last Friday night; felt like I was watching the nightly news.
Posted by: Mikey McD | 18 April 2011 at 09:12 AM
iphone changed "attended to attending"; ugh.
Posted by: Mikey McD | 18 April 2011 at 09:23 AM
Mikey, I was out of town for the last four days and missed the showing. Can you tell our readers where/when the film can still be seen? Thanks.
Posted by: George Rebane | 18 April 2011 at 09:53 AM
This is a funny post, George. Your unrelenting belief that a reality-based Washington D.C. is somehow possible is refreshing. But I fear you will be disappointed once again.
Posted by: Michael Anderson | 18 April 2011 at 10:28 AM
Tickets/Theaters or Atlas Shrugged (part 1)
http://www.atlasshruggedpart1.com/theaters
Posted by: Mikey McD | 18 April 2011 at 10:55 AM
Bo said it was pretty good...and even Tanya liked it
Posted by: Barry Pruett | 18 April 2011 at 04:16 PM
The movie lived up to expectations. The audience applauded at the end.
Posted by: Mikey McD | 18 April 2011 at 06:10 PM
I am fairly certain that you were sitting "with the home team!" Can't wait to see it.
Posted by: Barry Pruett | 19 April 2011 at 06:30 AM