George Rebane
For the last years I have been telling RR readers that California was heading toward becoming a ward of the federal government – in short, federalized (e.g. here). As with many major and momentous changes, I believe this was apparent to anyone who had a facility with arithmetic, and understood the basics of how wealth is produced. It turns out that such skills are at a premium, hence we bloggers do provide some modicum of early warning and added value to the received wisdom from the mainstream (and lamestream) media.
One of these major media outlets in California is, of course, the LA Times. And the worthies down there are finally starting to put things together. In their 4aug11 issue they report -
The dirty little secret is that California's current state budget is not $85.9 billion, the size of the much-debated, deficit-plagued general fund. You've got to add in the special funds ($34.2 billion) — much of them fed by fees dedicated for specific purposes — plus bond money ($9.4 billion). That totals $129.5 billion, but it still ignores federal dollars.
The real state budget includes an additional $79.2 billion in federal largesse, representing 38% of total state spending. This brings the grand total to $208.7 billion.
So the state of California is getting a nearly $209-billion spending program while putting up less than $130 billion itself.
So that is how far things have progressed. The state’s socialists still crow in satisfaction that California sends more dollars to Washington than we get back. While that is true, we must remember that those dollars are sent there under extreme duress (aka at gunpoint).
And what really seals our fate is that every one of those federal dollars comes back with an ‘owner’s manual’ telling us exactly how it should be disposed of and/or spent. The only leeway that the feds have left for us in Sacramento is the ability to continue hurting ourselves in every imaginable way possible. And this our legislature and governor are doing with a relish as they proudly demonstrate California’s “leadership” in how a state can mismanage its affairs. Soon Washington will even take that away from us and assume our comprehensive mismanagement from across the country.
Please stay tuned. (H/T to RR reader for the link.)
[update] A reader just emailed me the following story in the 3aug11 City Journal on the federally funded California high speed rail boondoggle. Such screw-ups in policy and execution continue bathing California, and this is just one of many examples illustrating the points made above of how two levels of government collide in costly incompetence.
And reader georgef (see his comment below) emails that -
... this is the "plain language" version of the new GASB-35 (Download GASB-35 Plain Language 7-28-11 Pension Accounting and Financial Reporting) standard. The previous drafts have been circulated for years; you can see the compromises necessary to get this result.
The discount rate topic is probably beyond the average reader but it is the essence of this level analysis. The actual upper limit of a pension cannot be predicted due to spiking, use of unused vacation, and sick time which boost the last year of a retroactive calculation.
The triggering event will be the required disclosure of GASB-35 amounts about the same time as the federal financing is reduced. The ability to borrow will be very limited.
That this California debt can only be handled by the feds - either by hopeless lending or destroying the dollar - should give some pause to those readers who consider it hyperbolic that California is already federalized.
Islamophobia – a rational response? (updated 1sep2011)
Ignorance is the handmaiden of tyranny. R. Clay Reynolds
A more compelling and terrible look into the mind of Islam is the tragic story of a young Palestinian woman who lived in Gaza. She was severely burned in a propane cooking accident about a year ago. Requiring more treatment than available in Gaza, she and her care givers pleaded with Israeli officials at the border checkpoint to be allowed to seek help at a nearby Israeli hospital. She was given a compassionate pass, proceeded to the hospital where she received treatment for her burns, and after recuperating she was released to return home.
George Rebane
As these pages long attest, for me the answer to the title question is a resounding YES. And our western governments aid and abet that as being the reasonable response. The progressive tsunami of proscribing anyone who evinces fear of Islam ranges from Mayor Bloomberg banning any and all inclusion of religion in the upcoming commemoration of 9/11 at Ground Zero, to Canadian police giving Muslims a pass on physically assaulting non-Muslims in public. (Read this piece in the 2aug11 Toronto Sun by David Menzies)
A year later, she arrives with three small children at the same checkpoint in hijab (nearby picture), looking obviously pregnant, and requesting to revisit the hospital to be checked for how her healing has progressed. The Israeli border guards sensed that something didn’t add up, and took her into custody. She was placed into a now standard interrogation/isolation compound nearby and asked to disrobe. Thereupon and in great distress, she confessed that she was a suicide bomber with a mission to go into the same crowded ward where she received her treatment, and then, surrounded by medical personnel and patients, she would detonate herself.
The Israeli video here shows the last moments of her interrogation and her detonating the twenty pounds of high explosive she had strapped to her belly. It is a devastating record of a dedicated and determined servant of Allah willing to kill without mercy the very people who showed her kindness and compassion, and all for the sole purpose that they were the most proximal infidels that in her zeal she could reach. That consideration overarched everything else in her life.
Continue reading "Islamophobia – a rational response? (updated 1sep2011)" »
Posted at 03:13 PM in Culture Comments, Current Affairs, Our Country, Our World, Religion | Permalink | Comments (164) | TrackBack (0)
Reblog (0) | |