George Rebane
Today the feds announced that almost a quarter million jobs were created in January, and the unemployment rate dropped to 8.3%. As an aside, it was reported that all the "economists and analysts" were again surprised because their predictions missed reality again by over a 100% - albeit 'reality' was a bit munged again by the feds. It continues to amaze me that these jokers can keep their jobs and still sway markets with their random dart throwing.
Nevertheless, here and on other blogs (e.g. Russ Steele's NC2012) we continue to point out the hokey way that unemployment is calculated. A few days ago I presented a little 'back of the envelope' (BOE) model of employment as affected by some gross national variables (here). In it I focused on the effect of technology driven productivity increases on unemployment rate. But I kept the historically declining fraction of the working age cohort constant that is still in the labor force. If you allow this fraction to continue decreasing, that means convincing more people to quit looking for work, then the unemployment rate will keep dropping. But does that represent a good situation for the country?

As more people give up on the jobs market, they are ensnared by the dole departments of government. And, of course, income inequality (see Gini index) continues to get bigger. And just like night follows day, the Democrats get more voters because they 'care about the poor'. And with more socialist hands on the levers of government, national debt keeps skyrocketing and the economy heads at the same brickwall that EU countries are speeding towards as you read this.
The above Excel spreadsheet is an expanded version of the last one; I have added the ability to play with the fraction of working age people actually in the workforce, i.e. working or looking for work. In the above scenario we reduce this fraction by half a percent per year. And, wonder of wonders, unemployment rate plummets over the next ten years. Eveyone who wants a job is working, and with numbers like 0.5% unemployment in 2022, we'll be happy dancing in the streets. The problem with this vision of Ameritopia is that over a hundred million working age people are sitting on their butts cashing in food stamps. Now there's a picture of social stability for you.
But what happens if we adopt national policies that attract a greater fraction, say 0.5%/year, of working age into the workforce? Even with productivity increases maintained at a modest 2%/year, we see the unemployment rate almost double in the next ten years. So if unemployment rate is the critical measure, as it today seems to be, then you don't want to create a situation where too many sheeple get enthused and actually start looking for a job.

So there you have it, a winning formula for the Democrats - point to the increasing number of jobs and dropping unemployment rate, but keep things hopeless enough to discourage job seekers, promise more government relief for the growing number of unemployed, and the whole thing is guaranteed to be impenetrable to the country's rank and file voters.
[The spreadsheet can be downloded here Download Employment2022A. The blue numbers are inputs you can change and watch the effect on that all important and little understood unemployment rate.]
[6feb12 update] Saw a remarkable interview with a senior analyst from the Brookings Institute on Fox News tonight. Apparently the steady stream of lies from the administration, progressives in Congress, and the lapdog lamestream about the middle class losing to the upper quintile is getting too much for even this prestigious left-leaning policy analysis organization. They had to set the record straight, else by their silence it would be reasonable to infer that they were party to the ongoing detour around truth. It turns out that their analysis also shows that the gains to the upper class did NOT come at a loss to the middle class. Furthermore, there is no loss of mobility between the American economic classes. For example, the chances that someone from the lowest quintile moving to the middle quintile is greater than 50%, and the chance that someone in the top quintile moving down is greater than one out of three. And yes, amazing as it is, the chance of getting to the top quintile from one of the upper quintiles is higher than getting there from the bottom quintile. Sumbich, now there's a clear reason for a fundamentally transformative revolution in America. (You think that ABC, NBC, CBS, MSNBC, NYT, Wash Post, ... carried this report?)
TechForum2012 inaugurates a new community event
George Rebane
This afternoon TechForum2012 passed into history as a wonderfully successful new type of luncheon speaker series focusing on the accelerating technologies that will affect all of us in how we work, play, learn, live long, and prosper. The event was sponsored by the Sierra Economics and Science Foundation to support its ongoing and expanding merit scholarship program built around its flagship annual TechTest, now in its sixth year.
It was heartening to see the community join in to support this fundraiser to encourage Nevada County’s young people to choose careers in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). America’s decline in STEM qualified workers has put our country at risk, and we believe that grass roots programs such as these developed and funded by SESF are a hopeful start on America’s road back. The fundamental objective of the TechTest programs is to serve as a template and resource to other counties and regions across the country, inviting them to stand on our shoulders and start their own merit scholarship support efforts to invite qualified young people to choose STEM careers.
Today’s SRO event had an attendance of over 160 community leaders from the media, government, education, and business. Our guest speaker was Mr Rick Hutley, VP of Global Innovations for Cisco. Rick Hutley is a world class business executive and motivational speaker on the leading edge technologies that are shaping all of our tomorrows. Russ Steele, SESF’s Executive Director, and I had the pleasure of starting the day with Rick with a congenial breakfast at Toffanelli’s.
The entire event was planned and managed by SESF volunteers Ms Laura van den Berg (Event Manager), Mr George Foster, and Mr Russ Steele representing the SESF board. Laura did an outstanding job in pulling together the furball that these projects all start out as, and served as the event’s mistress of ceremonies. Truth be told, she did marshall husband Luuk to help here and there.
Special thanks go to the distinguished array of TechForum2012 sponsors that include NCTV, The Union, KVMR, KNCO, AJA Video Systems, NCCA, Christine Foster Realtor, Olympia Mortgage and Investment, Grass Valley Chamber of Commerce, Nevada City Chamber of Commerce, ERC, the County of Nevada, and, of course Cisco Systems Inc. Their prompt and visible support made this launch a merited and meaningful standard for future TechForum events.
On a personal note, I was heartened to see the extreme interest in the reaction and participation of the attendees. Rick is disposed to an open give-and-take format of a presentation wherein questions can be asked at any time, and they were. This gave rise to a number of interesting and illuminating detours that added to the prepared remarks.
Rick’s talk touched on the implications and impact of the approaching Singularity (q.v.). He outlined the progression of Turing test (q.v.) mitigations as machines become more intelligent. All this progressing to the point of dismissing the utility of that classic test of machines achieving peer intelligence with humans. His conclusion was to substitute the test of whether humans consider machines as useful peers and partners in managing our resources and affairs, that would stand in for Turing and the Singularity. I suggested that perhaps a better test would be the event when machines weigh in and assess the utility of humans as their peers in managing this planet’s affairs. Rick Hutley mused that this indeed might be a better sign of fin de siècle, and graciously named it the Rebane Test. In any event Rick is not a strong proponent of the near-term advent of Singularity, even though on one of his summary slides he did note that machines would replace all human workers by 2035.
As you see, dear reader, this was a lively and informative presentation with the attendees sitting at the edge of their seats. The presentation and its Q&A went well beyond its scheduled time with the room filled to capacity. Afterward, the podium was crowded with people seeking to continue the discussion with Mr Hutley and other attendees.
Rick Hutley set the bar high for our next TechForum, and I want to assure all that SESF and its team of volunteers will do everything possible to meet these standards when we again assemble for TechForum. In the interval, we have the last seminar for TechTest2012 tomorrow at NUHS, and the exam itself will be given on 14 April 2012. Please visit sesfoundation.org for more information.
Posted at 08:24 PM in Culture Comments, Current Affairs, Happenings, Nevada County, Our Country, Our World, Singularity Signposts | Permalink | Comments (9) | TrackBack (0)
Reblog (0) | |