George Rebane
“Did you know that the moon is 1/49 the size of the earth, even though it is further away?” was a memorable entry in an early issue of Mad Magazine many years ago. I was reminded of it when reading George Boardman’s regular column in the 13mar17 Union this morning (here). For readers unfamiliar, Mr Boardman is a left-of-center commentator, a public persona possessing some progressive propensities, one of our community’s prominent observers of the human condition, a gentleman, and a favorite local columnist of mine.
His contribution today makes a mighty attempt to show how conservatives – led hereabouts by Congressman LaMalfa - have an incoherent, even hypocritical, ideology when it comes to wealth redistribution through food stamps. The Mad Magazine simile launches his piece with, “Some people have portrayed Rep. Doug LaMalfa as a heartless ogre for campaigning to reduce the number of people eligible for food stamps, even though 12 percent of the families in his district fall below the poverty line. … Other people suggest LaMalfa's a hypocrite for taking food out of the mouths of people while his family farm collected almost $5.3 million in rice and wheat subsidies from 1995 through 2013.”
Given the widespread abuse of the federal food stamp program, one would think that a prudent reduction of the number of food stamp recipients, as sought by LaMalfa, would be a laudable and proper effort for our MoC. But the real question is what does LaMalfa’s seeking to refine the eligibility of food stamp recipients have to do with a particular level of poverty in his district? And then the gratuitous charge, later unabashedly contradicted, of “taking food out of the mouths of people” is somehow connected with LaMalfa’s qualification for receiving federal farm subsidies. (My opposition to corporate subsidies, including agricultural, is a matter of record.)
As Mr Boardman later makes clear, Congressman LaMalfa seeks only to restrict the use of food stamps by the poor and destitute so as to obtain the maximum amount of wholesome and nutritious food items possible. However, even that is a sin according to our intrepid critic of conservatives as he quotes another progressive MoC – "You can't deny (food stamp recipients) their freedoms to make choices without violating their pursuit of happiness." And this brings us to the crux of the matter that now transcends food stamps.
I have yet to meet a progressive who can parse the nuances of welfare in a liberal democracy like ours used to be. The progressive holds firmly to the belief that those who pay the piper have no more right to call the tune than those who merely listen. Specifically, that people have the equal right to pursue their happiness no matter whether they themselves or someone else underwrites their pursuit. Unfortunately, that is not the way the world works, nor is it the way that our Founders fashioned the workings of our democratic republic. Gifts from others come with a purpose, and almost always with some proviso as to how the gift is to be used. And that is doubly so if such ‘gifts’ from the giver are extracted at the point of a gun.
We all know that every dollar dispensed by the state comes with a user’s manual. It was ever thus, and the progressives’ desire to selectively abrogate such restrictions in order to curry a compliant and grateful voter is the prime cause of the social rot in our inner cities and rural hinterlands.
Finally, Mr Boardman almost understands conservatives when he writes “conservatives have particular scorn for programs like food stamps, which they view as populated by freeloaders who are too lazy to work, and they see as another means of getting people to rely on a government check.” To buttress this blanket assessment, he quotes my observation that liberals want to “promote raw democracy through increasing the size of compliant, ignorant, and powerless electorates (e.g. through … expanded wealth transfers …)”
For the record, the above was drawn from my comment on the liberals’ desire to extend the voting franchise to all residents including illegal aliens which reads, “(We) recall that for years RR has called out such culture killing, vote buying practices here and elsewhere. The Left's two-fisted approach to global autocracy is 1) grow governments of elite central planners by promoting fraudulent societal needs (e.g. 'climate change'), and 2) promote raw democracy through increasing the size of compliant, ignorant, and powerless electorates (e.g. through politicized education, expanded wealth transfers, and now franchising non-citizen migrants). … The Left can do nothing save repeat their strong denials in the face of overwhelming evidence. But as Lenin has shown, that works.”
In citing me, Mr Boardman totally miscommunicates my clear and oft-repeated position on the necessity of national wealth redistribution as we approach the Singularity, and as AI, along with globally competing labor, continues to grow America’s pool of the systemically unemployed. If nothing else, I do wish that the gentleman would append a future codicil to make that clear.
Fox News California Beach Bum Living Off Food Stamps For Years
https://youtu.be/bP_izYhdehY
This is a reality check on who is abusing Food Stamps. I will bet interviewing SPD and Brier Patch checkers would identify some of Nevada County's Mountain Bums living the good life on Food Stamps.
Posted by: Russ | 13 March 2017 at 06:02 PM
Fox News California Beach Bum Living Off Food Stamps For Years
https://youtu.be/bP_izYhdehY
This is a reality check on who is abusing Food Stamps. I will bet interviewing SPD and Brier Patch checkers would identify some of Nevada County's Mountain Bums living the good life on Food Stamps.
Posted by: Russ | 13 March 2017 at 06:02 PM
I'm not At all in favor of food stamps being used to buy Hostess Twinkies Food stamps or a massive subsidy for the junk food industry I say restrict them to good healthy food staples and teach people how to cook
Posted by: Paul emery | 13 March 2017 at 06:42 PM
That's food stamps are a massive subsidy for the junk food instead
Posted by: Paul emery | 13 March 2017 at 06:44 PM
Gasp! Paul Emery is now officially a heartless right wing bastard.
He now proudly marches with Rush Limbaugh arm in arm.
He smirks as countless young poor children die of starvation in the mud.
How cruel! How evil!
See how that works, Paul?
Posted by: Account Deleted | 13 March 2017 at 09:31 PM
AS usual Walt you don't have a clue as to what I'm saying. I'm in favor 0f FOOD subsidies not SHIT subsidies.
Subsidize good healthy food for those in need.
Posted by: Paul Emery | 13 March 2017 at 10:13 PM
In honor of the good weather, here's an oldie but a goodie.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-BOFEm0pnW8
Posted by: ScenesFromTheApocalypse | 13 March 2017 at 10:34 PM
Paul at 10:13 - Sadly no, Paul doesn't get how it works. Went sailing right over his head.
Posted by: Account Deleted | 14 March 2017 at 07:01 AM
This has nothing to do with Mr. Boardman, who has no kids on his lawn I bet, but I like the article.
http://truepundit.com/exclusive-fbis-own-political-terror-plot-deputy-director-and-fbi-brass-secretly-conspired-to-wage-coup-against-flynn-trump-2/
Posted by: ScenesFromTheApocalypse | 14 March 2017 at 07:18 AM
It's interesting how one of the arrows in the Green Libertarian quiver is the idea of weaponized immigration. You might have to ask how often Mexico has used the same concept as a bargaining point in negotiations.
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-03-13/turkey-says-migrant-deal-has-ended-may-unleash-millions-refugees
Posted by: ScenesFromTheApocalypse | 14 March 2017 at 07:46 AM
How what works Scott? Pretty simple-only healthy food available for subsidies.
Posted by: Paul Emery | 14 March 2017 at 07:53 AM
Posted by: ScenesFromTheApocalypse | 14 March 2017 at 07:46 AM
It's interesting how one of the arrows in the Green Libertarian quiver is the idea of weaponized immigration.
Yeah.....I've raised that issue numerous times with "The Green Libertarian". Metaphorically speaking he runs around in circles with his fingers in his ears going....la la la la la la whenever it comes up.
Anybody know if Paul has children?
Posted by: fish | 14 March 2017 at 08:04 AM
You're jumping around on me Fish. Last thing on my mind was healthy food for subsidies. Do you have a problem with that?
Posted by: Paul Emery | 14 March 2017 at 08:13 AM
Posted by: Paul Emery | 14 March 2017 at 08:13 AM
Wasn't responding to you.
Posted by: fish | 14 March 2017 at 08:25 AM
re: PE 7:53AM.
Actually, I'd like to encourage that kind of thing. It's a welcome change from polls and Whack-A-Mole.
It's already done to some extent. It's worth a bit of research.
https://www.fns.usda.gov/snap/eligible-food-items
Defining more ineligible foods would be a tricky matter. Is apple juice a form of junk food (probably)? Ice cream? Milk? what's the difference between the two?
Posted by: ScenesFromTheApocalypse | 14 March 2017 at 08:25 AM
PE 753
Such are the problems when one chooses to mind other people's business, whether the minders are right wing or left wing.
Posted by: Gregory | 14 March 2017 at 08:48 AM
------PE @ 10:13 pm answers to Walt who has yet to post a single comment on this post. Then PE uses all caps on his foul mouthed four letter word. Hmmm. Bad example of bob and weave, and rope-a-dope. Unless he is the dope.
--------PE @ 8:13 am: "Last thing on my mind was healthy food for subsidies."
Ok, no subsidizing healthy food with food stamps. Last thing on my mind as well
-------@ 8:04 am. Don't know for sure the answer to question posed, but common sense says stupid people should not breed.
Posted by: Bill Tozer | 14 March 2017 at 09:33 AM
And PE chews on LaMalfa. The left is such a cartoon.
Posted by: Todd Juvinall | 14 March 2017 at 09:55 AM
Paul at 7:53 - you confirmed my view that what I had posted went right over your head.
I'll explain. You have a perfectly sensible view of only providing food aid to folks buying basic food necessities.
If Rush L. or George or I advocated the exact same view the left would howl like wounded dogs. If our president tried to implement the exact same change in our national food stamp program, there would be rioting the next day.
So, as I pointed out, you've joined the wicked, evil right wing conspiracy to starve poor people.
OK, now for Paul's sake - 'sarc off'.
The food stamp program is riddled with fraud. There are neighborhoods where the ebt cards are openly bought and sold or traded for drugs, guns, sex, - you name it.
And for Mr Boardman, yes - folks do buy lobster and expensive steaks with ebt cards. I suggest Mr Boardman take a few trips to certain hoods he won't find in Nevada Co.
Posted by: Account Deleted | 14 March 2017 at 09:56 AM
OK Scott no problem It's no interest to me anyway how people would or wouldn't react to anything that Rush Limbaugh would say but it's important to you so have at it. As I recall there used to be an option to food stamps that was indeed basic good food but that's to before food stamps became a subsidy for junk food industries Perhaps our congressmen could donate some food too hungry people since he's getting paid millions of dollars of Corporate welfare
Posted by: Paul emery | 14 March 2017 at 10:25 AM
"Perhaps our congressmen could donate some food too hungry people since he's getting paid millions of dollars of Corporate welfare"
That is exactly the difference between conservatives and liberals. A conservative would never tell Paul, me, or Bill Gates what to do with their money or how to spend it as they please. A liberal will always incessantly tell you what to do with your money, how to spend it, and on whom.
Love the story of when the city council of Cupertino approached Steve Jobs requesting he build a wanted recreational center for the city. He told them if they wanted one, they should build it themselves with all the taxes he pays the city.
I am personally opposed to giving food stamps to any able bodied single person of working age...with few exceptions. Hunger is a great motivator. Hunger drives a man to labor better than motivation seminars. People who are the United States without permission should not receive any food stamps either. Illegal is not a race, it is a crime.
Posted by: Bill Tozer | 14 March 2017 at 10:50 AM
Bill Bill Bill I am a taxpayer and some of my money goes to our congressmen's family to subsidize their private business what's right about that? You are opposed to food stamps for poor families but have no problem with $1 million going to our congressmen's family for what ?
Posted by: Paul emery | 14 March 2017 at 10:54 AM
PE cracks me up. Our Congressman? He was a private sector farmer until he ran for office so I suspect he paid a lot of taxes on 1800 acres of farmland.
Posted by: Todd Juvinall | 14 March 2017 at 11:11 AM
I think we would be better off not rushing a replacement for ObamaCare. First repeal it in total. For those that are on it, phase it out and if needed give a voucher until things settle down. When the democrats crammed this down the throats of America, they lied their way to passage with subterfuge and payoffs. I expect a free market solution is the best way which was in place prior to ObamaCare. And I recall the democrats said there were 43 million without medical insurance back then. So now only 10 million or so are on the mess called ObamaCare. What happened to the other thirty million? The democrats said "all" would be covered. Another lie.
So let's calm down, repeal the mess and transition into a free market with some safety nets for those that need it. Perhaps enhance Medicaid for now to cover those working poor.
Posted by: Todd Juvinall | 14 March 2017 at 11:22 AM
So Todd I take it you have no problem with farm subsidies such as those received by our Congressman. Last year the total in farm subsidies came to around 20 Billion, according to the Heritage Foundation. You are ok with that right?
http://www.heritage.org/agriculture/commentary/congress-gives-massive-subsidies-farmers-it-shouldnt
Posted by: uestion. | 14 March 2017 at 11:34 AM
Paul, please read what I wrote. There you go again putting words and arguments in other people's months. Typical. Some things do not change. I never said I have "no problem with 1 million going to our congressman's family." Where or where Paul did you ever come up with that statement? Did you pull that out of your butt or your head or are they interchangeable synonyms?
Yes, I am opposed to food stamps to any able bodied single person with few exceptions. Abled bodied single persons. I would have said able bodied single males, but that would not pass the equal protection clause nowadays. Exceptions might be for a single person providing daily care of an elderly parent for a few months.. Abled bodied means able to pick up a rake and go door to door asking if one could clean up the front sidewalk or yard in exchange for a sandwich or bowl of soup....outside only of course. No different from the barter system of exchanging services in Nevada City, for example. People work in improverished nations all day for a handful of rice. Hunger will drive a man to improve his lot in life like no other methods will when push comes to shove. Hunger will get you motivated without the bull pucky couch potatoe 'analysis paralysis'.
Yes, I am opposed to giving all and any persons food stamps that break into our country and have taxpayers like you buy them food for being here when they are forbidden by law to even be here. How absurd is that! We should not reward bad behavior. They have zero right to set foot on sacred US soil without seeking and obtaining prior permission. Again, very few exceptions. There is always the 'one offs'.
About corporate welfare, I am generally opposed. But just because corporate welfare exists (for a myriad of reasons), does not mean that two wrongs make a right. This topic deals with views of food stamps. Because GM got to screw the bond holders and little widowers teachers' pension funds over royally under Obama, does not give carte blanche to dole out food stamps with impunity.
Remember Paul, single able bodied does not mean healing up from injuries, going to school, shacking up with some down and out toothless woman with 5 kids, those mentally insane who are typical of those lost pitiful soul walking down Broad Street....If a man will not work, he shall not be fed. 'Will not' are the operative words. Now, charities can do as they please....and do.
Posted by: Bill Tozer | 14 March 2017 at 11:45 AM
uestion was from Paul Emery
Posted by: Paul Emery | 14 March 2017 at 11:58 AM
Bill
And your vie3w of subsidies for our Congressman?
Posted by: Paul Emery | 14 March 2017 at 12:00 PM
At first glance, barring junk food from food stamp purchase options seems reasonable. Yet, people buy what they like to eat, whether some nurionalists agree with their choices or not. We, in CA, have already banned ATM withdrawals from welfare accounts at ATM machines located on cruise ships and some casinos. If you are on welfare, what are you doing on a cruise ship heading to the Bahamas? Sure, your Dad could have bought you the ticket, but.........it looks bad. There are strings attached. An abled bodied person with no dependents of working age should have a bunch of strings attached....like too many to make it worth your while. Same with SSI. How many growers busted with 70k worth of product are on food stamps and crazy money (disability for can't coping with life) when revealed in the paper they are asking for public defenders and are on the public dole? More than one is too many.
I realize I am the exception, not the average joe. I lived in a broken down car with two infants and no job, no transferable skills, and down and out. Parked on the street and we hid under blankets at night. Wrote hot checks for diapers and formula, and always paid the stores back. Met with the managers and bookkeepers and made arrangements. I applied for child care help cause most of the meager money I earned went to the daycare lady. Sierra Childcare Services (or whatever they were called) left a message that said they are putting me on top of the list. Number one priority. I went down there and simply could not take a penny or fill out a form. Could not do it. I did promise them if the kids went hungry I would apply of food stamps. Never did. I watched them eat and anything left over I ate the scraps.
I could not ever tell someone to pick up a rake (borrowed) and go door to door if I did not do that myself. Worked for me, maybe not someone else. That old car got towed to the junkyard many moons and several family vacations on distant shores and a few houses ago. Hero to zero, Yale to jail, Penthouse to the outhouse, riches to living in a car...with two kids, to currently somewhere in between.
One thing has stuck with me. Old Cherokee woman on the rez in Oklahoma told me decades ago and I ran with it since? If you take the whiteman's money, you sell them your soul." That my story and it ain't changing. Never been in the mood to sell my soul or my self worth. Price is too steep.
Posted by: Bill Tozer | 14 March 2017 at 12:36 PM
Posted by: Bill Tozer | 14 March 2017 at 12:36 PM
Your story is better than mine.....
After my divorce went back to college and slept in my car because I couldn't afford to pay rent....used to wake up with ice crystals in my mustache. Sold blood plasma twice a week to eat and put a couple of gallons gas in the car when pick up work wasn't available.
Still have fond memories though! It does help one focus.
Posted by: fish | 14 March 2017 at 12:56 PM
I'm all for direct healthy food for those in need and not food stamps.
Posted by: Paul Emery | 14 March 2017 at 01:38 PM
re: PE @ 1:38PM
'Direct' means boxes of food instead of debit card with rule set? Remember that SNAP /CalFresh is probably nearing 10% of the state. Imagine the amount of work to be done at a county or city level.
It might make for a interesting jobs program, though.
Posted by: ScenesFromTheApocalypse | 14 March 2017 at 02:08 PM
PaulE 138pm - Sounds good Paul. What kind of "direct healthy food" program do you have in mind that would avoid the abuses suffered by the food stamps program?
Posted by: George Rebane | 14 March 2017 at 02:09 PM
Fish.
Ah, I forgot about selling plasma. Once my arms were so scratched and stabbed from dragging brush that the Palsma center thought I was shooting dope and refused to take my blood. Finally a doctor examined my arms and believed my story. Phew. Yep, too old for that nowadays. Ice crystals in the mustache? Oh, the memories of that magic hour before dawn when the cold and moisture seemed to work its way through the bones and into the marrow. Burrr. The Big Chill. Electricity on demand is something I never take for granted....even to this day.
It's one thing to be a starving student sleeping on floors and living off a bag of dry cereal, but I guess neither one of us thought we would be back in the cruel cold outside after marriage and playing house....or playing Big Time Charlie (in my case).
Food stamps? Actually, I care less what others do than what is in front of me today.
In the 30's there were no food stamps, no unemployment, the Great Depression and The Dust Bowl years. Hoover called government feeding people a slippery slope and had the Red Cross and those kind of organizations pass out seed packages.
Knew an old crusty crab that worked on the Hoover Dam or the Grand Coulee Dam back in his youth. He said that when the workers saw some guys approaching looking for a job, they would chase them off with their picks and shovels. "You ain't taking MY job! Get outta here!" They were focused, lol
Hard times make ya tough, easy street times make you soft. What don't break ya will make ya. Ebb and flow.
Food stamps? Guess they are passed out like candy nowadays. If you apply for Covered California on the phone, they automatically put you on food stamps if you qualify without your asking. Know 3 people who applied and all 3 were signed up. Two refused the food stamps and it was like pulling teeth....had to start the process over with repeated instructions of no food stamps.....like it is against the rules or something. The third caved in and took the food stamps. So, I am the least qualified to discuss the matter about others' choices. We all live with our choices, be they good,bad, or indifferent.
Who knows. Someday I might sell my soul if I ever believe there is no hope, no way, no how, and no Providence. Or,if I just give up caring. That day is not today. I have no control over what others do, as hard as I try to fight the concept.
Posted by: Bill Tozer | 14 March 2017 at 02:13 PM
from Paul: " It's no interest to me anyway how people would or wouldn't react to anything that Rush Limbaugh would say but it's important to you so have at it."
OK, I give up. Maybe some one else can have a go at explaining the point I was trying to make to Paul.
Let's try this, Paul - how about you go down to SPD and when you see some one using tax payer money to buy junk food, start pulling the items out that you just told us you didn't want them to have. Tell the worthy they shouldn't have this crap and you are going to take it away from them.
Go ahead, Paul. Back up your big time 'green libertarian' ideas with action and I think the other person involved will explain to you in no uncertain terms what I can't seem to get you to wrap your brain around.
Posted by: Account Deleted | 14 March 2017 at 05:49 PM
Well, since Dr. Rebane started this post by referencing Mad Magazine, it's only fitting that I finish the comments with a reference to Mad Magazine.
https://www.facebook.com/lastamericapatriots/photos/a.235087906641439.1073741826.235086849974878/815228408627383/?type=3&theater
Posted by: Bill Tozer | 18 March 2017 at 05:58 PM