[Will Mueller follow all the Russian collusion clues, or just the ones in sync with his political preferences? gjr]
« Scattershots – 10nov17 (updated 11nov17) | Main | Democratic Socialists of America (updated 14nov17) »
The comments to this entry are closed.
Todd
Did you register a complaint to the Republican leadership about the incessant. "Lock her up" (Hillary) chants during the Presidential campaign? I'm sure you did because you are sp passionate about your "not guilty without a trial" belief.
Posted by: Paul Emery | 14 November 2017 at 01:50 PM
Posted by: Paul Emery | 14 November 2017 at 01:50 PM
Thought I saw your face in the audience at this years "Glammys" Punch! Did you bring your presidential poll collection…..I hear thats pure gold with the ladies!?
http://www.theamericanmirror.com/video-maxine-waters-impeach-45-chant-sends-glamour-awards-frenzy/
Posted by: fish | 14 November 2017 at 02:11 PM
Posted by: Gregory | 14 November 2017 at 09:35 AM
Yes because we know the only way you can defend your position is to tear down others people's percieved credentials in your critical thinking free mind.
Posted by: Steven Frisch | 14 November 2017 at 02:30 PM
Good point Steve,, just like what is happening to Moore.
In fact the swamp dwellers don't like us "little people".
Those who are sick and tired of the goings on in D.C. are now the enemy. "We" ain't picking the right representatives.(just the ones they don't like.. Like Moore.)
LIBS already had that problem solved,(mostly) at least where the guy running for President is concerned.(super delegates)
Nope The swamp dwellers don't like us.
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/11/14/alex-marlow-establishment-hopes-stop-momentum-populist-voters-taking-roy-moore/
Posted by: Walt | 14 November 2017 at 03:07 PM
Paul Emery 150. You really are a disconnected person in tour noggin. I actually know the gal that started the chant. She is a friend of mine. But what that chant and your convicting Moore without a trial have to do with one another is only something you can come with. Loony.
Posted by: Todd Juvinall | 14 November 2017 at 04:45 PM
So Walt... if the swamp dwellers don't like you little people why did you vote for Trump who has filled the swamp with alligators and Burmese pythons?
The 'americanmirror', come on fishy? Solidly rated as a "QUESTIONABLE SOURCE" with an extreme right wing bias and known for distributing propaganda via non-sourced or credibility challenged sources.
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-american-mirror/
Posted by: Robert Cross | 14 November 2017 at 05:11 PM
Todd
Isn't Trump and his campaign team chanting "lock her up" assuming Hillary is guilty without a trial? I assume you agree because it is consistent with your concerns about Moore being assumed guilty without a trial.
Posted by: Paul Emery | 14 November 2017 at 05:22 PM
Posted by: Robert Cross | 14 November 2017 at 05:11 PM
The 'americanmirror', come on fishy? Solidly rated as a "QUESTIONABLE SOURCE" with an extreme right wing bias and known for distributing propaganda via non-sourced or credibility challenged sources
Uhhh.....Bobby.......all they do is show the video of Crazy Aunt Max spouting progressive gibberish for 4 minutes.....okay in that light I understand why you don’t want to watch it....it’s all her talking with no edits!
#bobbysapinhead
Posted by: fish | 14 November 2017 at 05:31 PM
Just what are you smoking Bob? Moore backs Trump. Moore beat the guy the establishment wanted. Forget that? (you and Paul need to see the memory Dr.)
"Old" ruling class won't give up that power without a fight.
You LIBS accept the party rules. You should know full well your vote is meaningless in the primary. Your "establishment" made that obviously clear... TWICE. Yet no bitching... Imagine that.
Posted by: Walt | 14 November 2017 at 05:31 PM
OH Paul... You know damned well she's guilty. The court of public opinion has cast judgment. You just in the denial section of the populous.
You didn't vote for her. So why in HELL do you care?
Posted by: Walt | 14 November 2017 at 05:38 PM
Paul Emery 522
You just are to dense to see the difference I guess.
Posted by: Todd Juvinall | 14 November 2017 at 05:42 PM
Stevie 2:30pm
I'm sure your VP of Climate and Energy writes beautifully and knows what side of the bread gets buttered.
One of the scientists who is high on my list of smart fellers (and spoken highly of by Freeman Dyson from their time together at Princeton's Institute for Advanced Study) astrophysicist Nir Shaviv, was invited to argue the Skeptic side in an Oxford Union debate last month. His draft statement was as follows:
Statistical murder. That does fit what the warmistas are guilty of at the moment. Steven, perhaps your VP of Climate and Energy will write us a rhyming couplet to explain why that is not the case.
Posted by: Gregory | 14 November 2017 at 05:56 PM
Semi-interesting read. Probably nothing illegal, but.
....
“Beginning in 2014, Fusion worked for a Russian businessman implicated in a $230 million money laundering scheme. Fusion’s job on the project was to investigate Bill Browder, a London-based banker who spearheaded the Magnitsky Act, a sanctions law vehemently opposed by the Kremlin.
Fusion was being paid by BakerHostetler, a law firm for the Russian businessman, Denis Katsyv, at the same time it was on the payroll of the Clinton campaign and DNC.”
And.....
“The Associated Press reported in Aug. 2015 that a portion of Prop 39 that promised to created 11,000 clean energy jobs per year had only created 1,700 jobs after three years. And more than half of the $300 million promised to public schools to improve energy efficiency had gone to consultants and energy auditors.”
http://dailycaller.com/2017/11/13/tom-steyer-billionaire-democratic-donor-and-fusion-gps-client/
“
Posted by: Bill Tozer | 15 November 2017 at 03:13 AM
Posted by: Bill Tozer | 15 November 2017 at 03:13 AM
Clean Energy Jobs Act,,,
http://sd24.senate.ca.gov/news/2016-01-20-california-clean-energy-jobs-act-proposition-39-progress-date
Posted by: Clue-Sew | 15 November 2017 at 09:01 AM
The trouble with too many bozos with guns,,,
'''Police say startled shoppers at the Colorado Walmart where a shooter opened fire and killed three stalled the search process after they drew their own handguns in defense.
The shoppers' immediate response to the violent event 'absolutely slowed' investigation as it left authorities scanning through surveillance tapes in pursuit of the single armed attacker.
The few innocent yet armed individuals were eventually weeded out as suspects, amid the several hour-long investigation which began Wednesday night and into Thursday morning.
A police spokesperson confirmed after the building had been deemed 'safe enough' to enter, officials quickly began examining footage from inside the supermarket, according to The Denver Post.
'That's when we started noticing that a number of individuals had pulled weapons,' said Victor Avila, who works in part for the Thornton Police Department.
'At that point, as soon as you see that, that's the one you try to trace through the store, only to maybe find out that's not him, and we're back to ground zero again, starting to look again. That's what led to the extended time.'
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5045479/Walmart-shoppers-drew-handguns-shooting.html
Posted by: Clue-Sew | 15 November 2017 at 09:29 AM
Posted by: Clue-Sew | 15 November 2017 at 09:29 AM
Concur……you really shouldn't be anywhere near a loaded firearm Bun-Sew!
Posted by: fish | 15 November 2017 at 09:31 AM
The trade-off here is 1) do we have law-abiding citizens draw their guns and stop the carnage by the shooter, and thereafter slow the investigation (given a citizen did not fell the shooter), or 2) do you let the shooter continue killing undeterred so as to speed up the post-massacre investigation. I vote for #1.
Posted by: George Rebane | 15 November 2017 at 10:22 AM
The worst Serial Killer in history was a Rooskie. He killed over a hundred. One at a time through strangulation. Mostly kids. This was in the 80's uf I can recall. Anyway, the cops finally got him but of course the commies did not want the world to knw they had one of thses nuts.
Posted by: Todd Juvinall | 15 November 2017 at 10:40 AM
Posted by: George Rebane | 15 November 2017 at 10:22 AM
Interesting but not terribly surprising that Doug thinks it more important for you as a citizen to potentially take a bullet so the cops aren't inconvenienced.
Posted by: fish | 15 November 2017 at 11:03 AM
So Todds hero Roy Moore is apparently making the case that he asked for permission from the parents of underage girls to date them. This is part of a bizarre exchange with his lawyer this morning where he insinuates that one of his questioners comes from a culture that allows marriage to young girls.
“If Roy Moore doesn’t remember, why would he say it’s false?” Ruhle asked the lawyer. “And why would he need permission from these girls’ mothers if they’re not underage?”
Garman fumbled for an answer.
“Culturally speaking, obviously there’s differences,” Garmon started. “I looked up Ali’s background there, wow, that’s awesome that you have got such a diverse background ― it’s really cool to read.”
Velshi and Ruhle both appeared perplexed.
“Culturally speaking, obviously there’s differences,” Garmon started. “I looked up Ali’s (Ali Velshi) background there, wow, that’s awesome that you have got such a diverse background ― it’s really cool to read.”
Velshi and Ruhle both appeared perplexed.
“What does Ali’s background have to do with dating a 14-year-old?” Ruhle responded. “Please answer: What does Ali Velshi’s background have do with dating 14-year-old girls?”
“In other countries, there’s arrangements through parents for what we would refer to as consensual marriage,” Garmon said.
“Ali is from Canada,” Ruhle said.
“I don’t know where you’re going with this, Trenton,” Velshi said.
Garmon continued to fumble his responses, leading Ruhle to another line of questioning.
“You have young daughters,” she told Garmon. “If your daughter was 14, would you think it’s appropriate that she date a man in his 30s? Would you think it was normal that a random man sign her yearbook?”
“I would say no,” Garmon said. “If someone came to me like what was postulated there and said, ‘May I date your daughter ― don’t know her age’ ― I would say no.”
Garmon confirmed he would continue to support the senate candidate.
At least Todd has one other person in his camp.
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/roy-moore-lawyer-msnbc_us_5a0c712be4b0b17ffce1d8ad?ncid=inblnkushpmg00000009
Posted by: Paul Emery | 15 November 2017 at 11:44 AM
Oh Paul Emery, you are too much. Your heroes, Bill Clinton and Harvey Weinstein are your mentors in perversion. Sad.
Posted by: Todd Juvinall | 15 November 2017 at 11:49 AM
Trump
What an idiot. Got mass He got gun shootings mixed up. Rancho Tehama Elementary School is in California not Texas.
Trump tweets yesterday
On Tuesday night, Trump tweeted this message:
"May God be w/ the people of Sutherland Springs, Texas. The FBI & law enforcement are on the scene. "
what an idiot.
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/donald-trump-shooting-wrong-tweet_us_5a0bedf9e4b0bc648a0ebb0a
Posted by: Paul Emery | 15 November 2017 at 11:59 AM
Posted by: Paul Emery | 15 November 2017 at 11:59 AM
Oh I think a little latitude should be granted in this Punch:...unlike you the president is a busy man.
Posted by: fish | 15 November 2017 at 12:16 PM
"This is part of a bizarre exchange with his lawyer this morning where he insinuates that one of his questioners comes from a culture that allows marriage to young girls."-Punch-E
Like France and the Islamic State?
The Babes in Royland rhetoric is being aimed at Alabama, not Nirvana Silly, 'Frisco or New York. Moore is pushing an us-versus-them no holds barred. The GOP can't abide the message and will try to scuttle his win. Again. The Paul Emerys just want to muddy the waters.
Posted by: Gregory | 15 November 2017 at 12:23 PM
Todd
AS sleazy as Clinton and Weinstein are I don't believe there are any accusations of them molesting children like your guy Roy Moore. That's even below the standards of our Pussy Grabbing Braggart President.
Posted by: Paul Emery | 15 November 2017 at 12:24 PM
For news man you don't know much do you? Both Clinton and Harvey are accused of that. My goodnessClinton travels on the Pedophilia Express flights of E[stein to Pedophilia Island. And Harvey diddled young women on his couch or masturbated in front of them. You need to start reading something other than your on news.
Posted by: Todd Juvinall | 15 November 2017 at 12:33 PM
Googling...
http://www.frontpagemag.com/point/262853/why-bill-clintons-26-trips-lolita-express-child-daniel-greenfield
Bill Clinton reportedly ditched his secret service shadows for five of those trips, and his host did have a 14 year old sex slave purchased from her parents..
Posted by: Gregory | 15 November 2017 at 12:34 PM
Sorry Todd
Show me the specific example of Weinstein or Clinton being accused of sex with a minor.
Posted by: Paul Emery | 15 November 2017 at 12:46 PM