Doing it to ourselves – why? (updated 12aug20)

[The Nevada County Board of Supervisors will again vote on Item 26 this coming Tuesday.  Item 26 involves the passage of an "urgency ordinance" that will levy draconian fines on NC residents and businesses for violating any of the decrees and diktats regarding Covid-19 passed by higher up government jurisdictions, and piles on a passel of additional ones in the form of a county ordinance (here) to which we who live here will be subjected.  None of this local government overreach and virtue signalling is necessary since we are all aware of the Covid-19 infection dangers and know how to mitigate the risk - our stats demonstrate.  We don’t need our local pols to establish a legion of STASI-like plain clothes snitches who will cite innocent infractions with fines of thousands of dollars.  We don’t have to do it to ourselves.  Write to your supervisor about opposing Item 26 on the agenda.  My sweetie-pie Jo Ann is doing her part, so I asked if I could publish some of the drafts of letters and emails she is sending to the Supes and senior county staff members.  Hopefully, some of these will inspire you to drop them a line.  gjr]

Jo Ann Rebane

BOS Agenda, Tues. 8/11/20, item 26 – live public meeting             

Consideration of item 26, the urgency enforcement ordinance should be held during a live public meeting.  As a board you previously sat through not hours, but DAYS of public comment on the Marijuana Urgency Ordinance.  The public needs to personally express their comments and personally see and hear your reactions thereto on this version of the urgency enforcement ordinance.  Surely you can figure out a way to let the public address your board in person while maintaining social distancing and other covid precautions. 

BOS Agenda, Tues. 8/11/20, item 26 – OPPOSE

I oppose the revised and current version of item 26, urgency covid enforcement ordinance.  This version is draconian.  It encourages the public to “snitch” or “tattle-tale” on individuals, businesses and commercial enterprises to cause code enforcers to levy excessive and confiscatory fines.  There is enough acrimony in this county already.  Don’t stir up more divisiveness.

BOS Agenda, Tues. 8/11/20, item 26 – OPPOSE

I oppose agenda item 26 for the express OVERREACH which makes it unlawful for any individual, business or commercial enterprise to do anything contrary to orders of ANY governmental body, agency or individual at any level in California.  It is impossible for the public to know all those rules, regulations, edicts, and orders.  Send this draft to the waste can.

BOS Agenda, Tues. 8/11/20, item 26 – OPPOSE

I urge you to oppose agenda item 26.  This county and its businesses, including restaurants did everything the governor required under the initial order in March.  This county qualified for special opening status and re-opened carefully.  Restaurants and others invested heavily in costly infrastructure and what did they get – another shut-down.  This county continues to qualify for the special relaxed opening status but the governor’s recent order doesn’t recognize this.  We comply and he punishes us.  Does one size fit all counties? 

BOS Agenda, Tues. 8/11/20, item 26 – OPPOSE

I urge you to oppose agenda item 26.  The Nevada County Board of Supervisors should be fighting the governor not our local businesses.  Scrap the urgency ordinance and fight for our county’s businesses and not against them.

BOS Agenda, Tues. 8/11/20, item 26 – OPPOSE

Please oppose agenda item 26.  I urge the board of supervisors to petition/urge/lobby the governor to rescind the statewide “close all restaurants” order.  Nevada County is one of the “open” counties (but how can we tell?).  There is not one case of covid emanating from a restaurant here,  our hospitals are not impacted, and this county has done everything it was required to do to move to the current phase of opening. 

BOS Agenda, Tues. 8/11/20, item 26 – OPPOSE

That the governor threatens to withhold recovery funds feels like blackmail for an offense that wasn’t committed.  Arbitrary, capricious, politically motivated, and wrong-headed. 

I would rather see the BOS stand up for the community and its businesses than to enact a punitive urgency ordinance.  You, Supervisors and the city councils should be doing all in your power to NOT lose another business (tax payer).   

Address comments by email for this BOS item in this format:

To: [email protected], [email protected]
Cc: Dan Miller <[email protected]>, [email protected], [email protected], Scofield Ed <[email protected]>, Anderson Richard <[email protected]>
Subject: BOS Agenda, Tues. 8/11, Item 26

[11aug20 update gjr]  Mercifully, the ‘urgency ordinance’ with its revised, yet still draconian, fines was defeated yesterday by the BOS, thanks to Supervisors Scofield and Hoek.  Why Supervisor Dan Miller pulled a ‘John Roberts’ on us is still a mystery, or is it?  His suggestion that the fines be “reduced by half” to (seatbelts please) $500, $1,000, $2,500 for the first three offenses defined by ordinance was jaw-dropping.  And it begs an answer to ‘why are we doing this to ourselves?’

Well, the answer may have been in front of us all these years, and is still there – Nevada County remains anti-growth and anti-business.  Under this policy the county has struggled for decades to collect enough tax revenues to barely make ends meet, and with the ongoing and insane ‘greening’ of government, it is clear that taxes from our remaining businesses and residents will not cut it.  So, the answer to the shortfall now in progress is a quiet but still visible shift to increase punitive revenues with a marked step-up in collecting fines and fees from code violations.  This tack is exactly the socialist counter to policies required for our county’s long overdue economic growth.  In the 12aug20 Union Michael Taylor expands on all this in his ‘Nevada County is ramping up enforcement to generate revenue’, and it most certainly explains away Dan Miller’s vote.

Comments

[Gregory]

here's an interesting paper... "COMMENTARY: Masks-for-all for COVID-19 not based on sound data"
https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/news-perspective/2020/04/commentary-masks-all-covid-19-not-based-sound-data

"Dr. Brosseau is a national expert on respiratory protection and infectious diseases and professor (retired), University of Illinois at Chicago.
Dr. Sietsema is also an expert on respiratory protection and an assistant professor at the University of Illinois at Chicago."

[Gregory]

I've hit a brick wall of "moderation" at The Union in an arguement with Dick Sciaroni.

Three variations of the following were placed in AWAITING MODERATION after Dick hit me pretty hard:

"Now, if we can get the false statement back into play, that wearing a mask protects the wearer. It doesn't. It protects others from the wearer, which isn't terribly valuable if the wearer doesn't have the disease. Here's expert opinion backing that claim:

https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/news-
perspective/2020/04/commentary-masks-all-covid-19-not-based-sound-data

"Give it a rest, Mr. Engineer"

You can't have it both ways, Dick... either our educations don't matter, or they do, and we'd both be resting if you hadn't been giving us the runaround. And if you really want a rest, you'll drop it yourself without yet another dig."

Having heated discussions with one arm tied behind my back gets old.

[Paul Bevelhymer]

BOS Agenda, Tues. 8/11/20, item 26 – OPPOSE

Please oppose agenda item 26. I urge the board of supervisors to petition/urge/lobby the governor to rescind the statewide “close all restaurants” order. Nevada County is one of the “open” counties. There is not one case of covid from a restaurant here, our hospitals are not impacted, and this county has done everything it was required to do to move to the current phase of opening.

[Don Bessee]

No go -

https://www.theunion.com/news/nevada-county-supervisors-vote-down-urgency-covid-19-ordinance/

;-)