George Rebane
How do you talk math with someone who believes 2+2=5?
As I scan the morning papers and posts, some inevitable thoughts, idle and maybe not so idle, bubble to the surface.
The above tag line is apropos to the total breakdown in America’s public discourse, and I do mean total. This week ‘Thousands Flood National Mall to Protest Racial Injustice’ screams a headline with photos showing the usual crowd with t-shirts and signs assembling at the Lincoln Memorial on the anniversary of MLK’s ‘I have a dream’ speech. None of them know that they are blessed to live in the world’s most racially just country. And the overwhelming share of them, those not of cynical purpose, suffer from ignorance on steroids. Along with world-class racial justice in our land, every metric that may have pointed to racial injustice has been trending in the right way over the last decades. What remains of evidence for residual racial injustice has been fomented and perpetuated for decades under Democrat administrations who have established and administered the plantations of reliable voters in inner cities. (more here)
None of the know-nothings can describe what in their minds racial justice would look like in America. Their only insane conclusion, embedded by their corrupt thought leaders like Sharpton, is that President Trump is the underlying cause of racial injustice and must be tossed from office this November. Then with Biden there will be happy dancing in the streets while bullets continue to fly, and the thousands of black lives that don’t matter will continue to drop like flies. Since they have no clue about or desire to improve black lives, you can bet the ranch that socialist planners are now busy coming up with the next round of rightwing scapegoats to blame for black under-achievement that the Democrats in charge can again sidestep.
Taking the 50Kft view, it’s hard to tell where is the boundary between ignorance and stupid. How many of them and theirs are intellectually irredeemable? What dialogues or training remain in the realms of the possible or even the plausible? It would not surprise me if tomorrow’s socialist planners will lament the premature rejection of eugenics (introduced and touted by America’s socialists), as they contemplate the latest uses of technology for creating Marx’s ‘perfect man’ to inherit the Earth.
A parallel stream of contemplation comes closer to home when we consider the sorry state and direction of California. In ‘California Needs Ideas’, Holman Jenkins reminds us of the utter idiocy that forms the foundation of our Democrats' obsession with what they believe to be preventable manmade global warming. “No climate policy is available that would operate on a time scale relevant to California’s hellish wildfire challenge, except throwing enough opaque particles into the atmosphere to cool the Earth. … Anything that greens might favor, such as subsidizing green energy or taxing fossil fuels out of existence, is irrelevant. The effect would only manifest itself imperceptibly over many decades. To boot, it would require the participation of the world’s major economies, including China’s and India’s, which leaders answerable to California’s voters are in no position to deliver. … I make these points to underline an absurdity. California politicians spend much of their time obsessing about a climate change problem they can’t fix. Their state accounts for less than 0.1% of global emissions. There’s nothing they can do.” In Sacramento stupid is forever, and the saddest part is that stupid is contagious in California – look around you.
Continuing this line of thought brings us to this morning’s editorial in our beloved (29aug20) Union. Their Saturday editorial reflects the aggregate thought of the newspaper’s editorial board – full disclosure, Jo Ann is a member. Today they ask us to ‘Imagine if everyone voted’. The piece begins by recounting the adoption of the 19th Amendment and the (silly?) reasons people argued against women becoming franchised to vote. Well and good, but then they launch into a bit of perspective and philosophy to “give us a chance to reflect on where we’ve been, and remember what it took to get where we are.” Immediately they trip over the much-disproven but still politically correct shibboleth – “The past is a chapter already written and set in stone.” Nothing could be further from the truth today, if ever. The past has always and many times over been rewritten by the victors. Such wild revisionism continues to this day, and there is no sign that the practice will ever let up. Today’s curriculum about our past is in a froth of wordsmithing that seeks to capture the most woke interpretation of our history to inculcate the current generation of young people. (more here)
The Union’s collected wisdom concludes with a heavy dose of hopeful fog. “Imagine what our country would look like if everyone who could vote did, and exercised that right regularly. Just imagine.” Before our fevered imaginations can take wing, we do need a bit of clarity here. Who are the “everyone who could vote”? Are they all American citizens, or just registered American citizens, or just all legal adult residents of America, or all adult residents of America, or also our nascent middle school students, or …, who? Our imaginations would be directed in very different directions were we to know who were the intended who. Given the strong leftwing tilt of The Union, people of my ilk would not err much if such imagining began with some considerable trepidation.
‘Critical Ethnic Studies’, say whaat??!!
George Rebane
Former US Asst SecEd and Independent Institute senior fellow Williamson M. Evers lays the whole thing out in the 28aug20 WSJ – ‘Critical’ Ethnic Studies Returns to California. His report goes a long way to answer the perennial question of how our younger generation has turned out in the aggregate to be so uncritical, compliant, and just plain dumb. And for the country’s hardworking Orwellians, the adoption of this new mandatory curriculum into our high schools promises that for them the best is yet to come. No student will graduate without having passed this course. Dr Evers makes the case that “the state’s new curriculum prefers victimization to minority achievement, and Marxism to liberal values.”
Critical ethnic studies is actually making its second appearance at California’s Board of Education. The “radical and jargon-laced” 2019 version was sent back for a more “toned down” draft. Well, it didn’t work. The new and improved 2020 version not only didn’t correct any of the 2019’s “conceptual problems”, but has now been told by our state’s Dept of Education “to resuscitate” the really bad parts cut from the 2019 version.
Among the litany of dreadful stuff that our students will have rammed down their cognitive craws are the newly focused victim “groups that dominate the curriculum … African-Americans, Latinos, Asian-Americans, and American Indians.” However, “excluded from California’s model curriculum are the white ethnic groups (Italians, Irish, Poles and so forth)”. The course will actually “boil down to vulgar Marxism, identity politics, and victimology.” Among the identified bad people in the world will be America’s Irish and Jews; why? because they have “secured white racial privilege.”
As you might expect from such bilge water, “the revised model curriculum in California portrays capitalism as oppressive and gives considerable weight to America’s socialist critics.” These critics are portrayed as ideologically correct and pure, without a tinge of bad parts like racism or discrimination. Yet, as Evers reminds us, “history and political science show that the state can be used readily under socialism for racist purposes. Obvious examples include the Soviet Union’s 1948-49 purge of “rootless cosmopolitans”—that is, Jews—and its 1951-53 Doctors’ Plot attack on Jewish physicians. Under socialism, a bureaucratic elite controls all job assignments, news media, courts and the secret police. When that elite is envious, insecure or looking for a scapegoat, what chance does an ethnic minority have?” Other horrific examples are easily obtained from Nazi Germany, Red China, Yugoslavia, Turkey, … .
All this history is omitted, and will neither pollute nor divert our high schoolers. For our young minds the world out there will be exquisitely formed so that what they are carefully taught will stick when they hit the streets to look for a job, vote, and demonstrate. They will have all the correct answers they need to understand and interpret what they see and experience.
Dr Evers concludes his essay with –
The proponents of critical ethnic studies are so insulated by Marxism and identity politics that they miss insights from other fields. The new curriculum doesn’t give a balanced picture of America and, in these racially charged times, it could ignite truly ugly disputes. Perhaps worst of all, it gives short shrift to minority achievement and deprives students of the optimistic view of America. Following this curriculum, students would have no basis on which to understand Frederick Douglass’s defense of the U.S. Constitution as “a glorious liberty document” and his celebration of the potential of a country based on natural and inalienable rights.
All this, coming to a California high school near you. And some still wonder why SNAFU continues so perfectly to describe the state of our state. Now you need wonder no more.
Posted at 10:31 AM in California, Critical Thinking & Numeracy, Culture Comments, We the iSheeple | Permalink | Comments (5)
Reblog (0) | |