George Rebane
[Apologies for the late posting of this promised follow-on commentary.]
Thoughtful comments from readers expanded the scope of my 4oct20 ‘I want Trump to die’ commentary to encompass social behaviors that may or not be acceptable and/or legal under our current form of governance. And this includes a wide variety of people’s aspirations for regicide and its modern versions that include the leaders of more representative and therefore more liberal governments. More specifically, comments from progressive readers such as Steven Frisch who strongly asserts, “I have stated here on many occasions that I do not believe that political violence is justified in American society. I have also stated on many occasions that I believe that some of the rhetoric used on this page, and the tacit acceptance of the threat of, or insinuation of, political violence is philosophically un-American and un-patriotic.”
As a conservetarian, I take great issue with such a belief while acknowledging that it is held by most, but not all, liberals and progressives in America. The new neo-Marxist wing of the Democratic Party has no such inhibitions against political violence. In fact, in the written manifestos on their websites, neo-Marxist organizations such as BLM, proudly declare their support of, and even the necessity for such violence to topple corrupt and unjust political orders. They back this up with their actions in the streets and voluminous statements to the press justifying politically motivated riots.
In these pages over the years I have often argued that in a liberal and free country, the citizens’ right and ability to violently oppose their government should always be recognized, celebrated, maintained, and not be insidiously abridged by government. Although and without contradiction, if such a purposely violent cohort does arise, the non-violent citizens opposing that cohort have every right to petition and support their government in opposing such violence with all the force provided it by established laws. In short, a free people are free only to the extent that they retain their ability to successfully resist their government in order to be able to fundamentally transform it through reform or revolution.
We understand these truths from the historical fact that America was born through political violence, and that the subsequent exercise of political violence has served to preserve the Union many times since. To now declare that political violence has suddenly become “un-American and un-patriotic” as a basic right of a free people, provided for in our Constitution, is both preposterous and ignorant of the fundamental principles and means of our country’s founding and maintenance.
Here I once more expand on the rationale for these beliefs in ‘Versions of Fundamental Transformations’ which you can download here - Download VersFundTransforms. Long time readers are aware of the bases for these beliefs from the collected tenets of my credo and related commentaries over the years – see also the Bastiat Triangle, a Conservetarian Credo, and the Rebane Doctrine category of this blog.
That violence stuff can be a pretty complicated thing.
Just ask these people who are blessed with living in a Blue County.
https://www.kiro7.com/news/local/its-beyond-words-grandparents-targeted-drive-by-shooting/XIJMXSO4EBHSRFERQ6EZHHIA3E/
Posted by: scenes | 16 October 2020 at 04:12 PM
George, you need to discontinue publishing your blog in French. Seems that a guy from the Religion of Peace today beheaded a teacher in France for displaying the Charlie Hebdo Mohammed cartoons. Bad translations rarely end well.
Trump = professeur. Even I have that translation in my Duolingo app.
Posted by: The Estonian Fox | 16 October 2020 at 06:23 PM
This would make the ideal alarm clock.
https://twitter.com/johncardillo/status/1317850416537849857
Posted by: scenes | 18 October 2020 at 02:31 PM