« Right vs Left – what distinguishes us (updated 17jun22) | Main | Scattershots – 21jun22 (23jun22) »

18 June 2022


Scott O

I read the opinion piece and found that it was a masterful mish-mash of some true statements completely stirred into a stew of word salad and over simplification. Very, very few actual examples were offered and they were often couched in ways that magically extrapolated out to include whole groups instead of the handful of actual humans they might find as examples.
One thing I learned from Hunter Thompson decades ago was to ask: "who's 'they' and who's 'them'?"
If you cite an example of some hypocrisy or a foolish, or inaccurate statement or belief - you'd better attach a name or group that can be checked by the average person. Otherwise, it's just fluff and bluff.
I really don't want to know what these gentlemen are being paid per annum. Low intelligence grifters, both.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)