George Rebane
‘Settled’ is not an adjective to be used with real science.
The recently released AR6 report by the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has injected new life into climate hysteria that seems to have been flagging over the last few years. The usual hysterics are again up in arms with another round of outlandish warnings and proposals to tank the economies of the developed countries, led, of course, by the US. More sober and knowledgeable scientists are saying ‘not so fast’.

Physicist Steven Koonin has been introduced in these pages as one of the leading sober and knowledgeable scientists who has for some years now been counseling a more measured view of climate change. His recent best seller, Unsettled: What Climate Science Tells Us, What It Doesn’t, and Why It Matters (2021), summarizes the unsubstantiated fears and foibles that continue to be foisted on the lay public worldwide. The 11aug21 WSJ, from which the nearby figure was filched, contains his critique of AR6, and is definitely worth a read. I’ll give some highlights.
To begin for those late to this pity party, what all the fuss is about that we are ignoring a global catastrophe in process – namely, preventable manmade global warming (PMGW). Every word in that label is important, and it’s the ‘preventable’ part that promises to be most devastating to the fortunes of developed countries. You have to be convinced that we humans did it all by ourselves, and that therefore we can and must roll back global warming all by ourselves.
In ‘Climate Change Brings a Flood of Hyperbole’ Dr Koonin begins with -
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has issued its latest report assessing the state of the climate and projecting its future. As usual, the media and politicians are exaggerating and distorting the evidence in the report. They lament an allegedly broken climate and proclaim, yet again, that we are facing the “last, best chance” to save the planet from a hellish future. In fact, things aren’t—and won’t be—anywhere near as dire.
The entire history of climate reporting has been a mire of politicized fraud. RR readers learned years ago that all the prognostications about PMGW are based on a collection of incoherent, incomplete, and essentially broken general circulation models (e.g. we don't understand earth's CO2 cycle). The have been twisted beyond recognition by true believers and fraudsters to yield the gee-whiz graphs and endlessly repeated, hysterical talking points.
It is already easy to see things in this report that you almost certainly won’t learn from the general media coverage. Most important, the model muddle continues. We are repeatedly told “the models say.” But the complicated computer models used to project future temperature, rainfall and so on remain deficient. Some models are far more sensitive to greenhouse gases than others. Many also disagree on the baseline temperature for the Earth’s surface. … The latest models also don’t reproduce the global climate of the past. The models fail to explain why rapid global warming occurred from 1910 to 1940, when human influences on the climate were less significant. The report also presents an extensive “atlas” of future regional climates based on the models. Sounds authoritative. But two experts, Tim Palmer and Bjorn Stevens, write in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences that the lack of detail in current modeling approaches makes them “not fit” to describe regional climate. The atlas is mainly meant to scare people.
The other big bamboozle involves pointing to unusual weather as confirmation of climate change. These assessments and dire pronouncements are made daily by innumerates who have no idea what science is or how it can substantiate something.
Extreme weather events are invoked as proof of impending disaster. But the floods in Europe and China and record temperatures across regions of the U.S. are weather, not climate—singular events, not decadeslong trends. Both Europe and China have experienced equally devastating floods in past centuries, but these are forgotten or deliberately ignored. The drought and wildfires in the Western U.S. are part of a trend going back a few decades, but forest management and expanding human presence in the forests are perhaps more important than climate change in causing these events. … The report expresses low confidence in most reported hurricane trends over the next century, and it remains uncertain whether there’s any trend beyond natural variability in Atlantic hurricanes. In other words, we have no scientific proof that humans have made hurricanes worse, despite what many say.
The IPCC report reveals very little that is new. It is mostly the repackaging of past reports by a legion of contributing authors, each working within their narrow field. The almost 4,000 page tome has been read by very few, and understood by even fewer. Nevertheless, AR6 will feature prominently in the upcoming November UN Climate Change Conference in Glasgow. So it’s important to understand both the nature of its contents and misrepresentations about PMGW that are always prominent in the executive summary and conclusion sections of what the IPCC publishes. Here is the AR6 Headline Statements from the Summary for Policy Makers.
Refreshingly, the report deems its highest-emissions scenarios of the future unlikely, even though those are the ones you’re mostly likely to hear about in media reports. The more plausible scenarios have an average global temperature in 2100 about 2.5 degrees celsius warmer than the late 1800s. The globe has already warmed 1 degree since that time, and the parties of the Paris Accord arbitrarily agreed to limit further warming to another degree. But since humanity’s well-being has improved spectacularly, even as the globe warmed during the 20th century, it is absurd to suggest that an additional degree of warming over the next century will be catastrophic. In fact, the AR5 report from 2014 says even 1.5 degrees of additional warming by 2100 will have minimal net economic impact. … Good science is characterized by detail, data, proven models and reasoned debate. That takes time. Meanwhile, we should be wary of the torrent of hyperbole that is sweeping the globe.
Dark Days Diary – 8jan22 (updated 12jan22)
George Rebane
The shameful declines of Scientific American and NPR. In days of yore, both media outlets were posterchildren of professional and responsible journalism. And during the last twenty years both have embarked on a shameful decline that shows no signs of stopping. SA, published continuously since the 1840s, served as the periodic and apolitical compendium of scientific advances served up for the intelligent reader. No longer. Today it has subverted to a progressive propaganda organ that sees all aspects of science as being race-based, and promotes a fundamental change to scientific enquiry founded on Marxist class/racist principles (here). We have already covered the decline of what is now National Propaganda Radio which serves as the publicly funded ($100M annually) voice of the Democratic Party, tilting daily more to its radically woke wing (here). What pisses me to the gills is the amount of its taxpayer funding that the Republicans have been silent about for years.
Comparative corruption in global governance. In an ongoing discussion with a friend and correspondent who is a retired international banker, we have focused on the existence of corruption in almost all governments, and which countries do better than others to actively control corruption. My friend spent many years stationed in various countries and experienced first hand their inner workings which were very much in evidence through their baking and financial institutions. Costa Rica is the standout anti-corruption posterchild in the otherwise terminally corrupt gaggle of Latin American nations. Many thousands of American expatriates have retired to Costa Rica, and now call it their home while maintaining their US citizenship. The chart below (compiled by the World Bank in its Worldwide Governance Indicators) provides a basis for that emigration over the years. I am surprised to see that the US rated so high, given its recent decline from the rule of law (and constitutionalism), and the growth of an obviously corrupt ‘deep state’ bureaucracy.
[9jan22 update] ‘More Good News on Ivermectin’ and more evidence that the politicization of the Covid-19 pandemic cost millions of preventable deaths. So have the physicians and researchers of “the Frontline COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC) been calling for widespread adoption of Ivermectin, both as a prophylactic and for the treatment of all phases of COVID-19.” History will record that what has happened in the last two years across the globe has been one of greatest politically motivated mass murders on record. And those complicit can never admit to their perfidy in promoting the proscription of this effective, readily available, and demonstrably safe medicine, for the adjudication of their criminality would require the empaneling of a Nürnberg-like court, and this will never happen. Nevertheless, the record of this unrequited tragedy should always remain available. Dark days indeed.
[10jan22 update] Our housecleaner closed down after 30 years in the business. She and her excellent crew have been part of our extended family for half of those years. In her letter to us she cited the reasons for quitting as the usual litany of California’s war against entrepreneurship and capitalism – taxes, stifling regulations from all levels, varying Covid mandates, government checks for not working, and so on. And sadly, she was not able to give us a reference to another local housecleaning business. The reason? In Nevada County she was the last holdout against the state’s anti-business winds, all of the other reputable housecleaners preceded her in pulling the plug. More signs of the times.
North Carolina Lt Gov Mark Robinson on reparations. This two minute video (here) of his last year’s speech to the state’s GOP is guaranteed to moisten your eyes and send chills down your spine, unless you are a Democrat doing plantation maintenance in the country’s urban areas.
[12jan22 update] Government of the elites, by the elites, and for the elites. More information continues to be made public about the large-scale perfidy promoted by various agencies of the federal government and gratuitously integrated into the radical progressive policies in practice and promoted by the Democratic Party through its control of the administration and Congress. Project Veritas has obtained documents that shed more light on what our government has done in promoting overseas gain-of-function research and suppression of the demonstrated benefits of Hydrochloroquine and Ivermectin in the treatment of Covid in all its phases. This lends further credence to the allegations that senior government officials like Dr Fauci have purposively misled the American public and contributed to the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Americans and millions across the world. H/T to reader. (More here and here)
Posted at 10:38 AM in Critical Thinking & Numeracy, Culture Comments, Our Country, Our World | Permalink | Comments (45)
Reblog (0) | |