George Rebane
Our socially destructive culture has long done a number on students with the extraordinary capacity to study and make it in STEM careers. Part of the socialist agenda for the US is to impress in the population a belief that we are fundamentally all equal, with all of us capable of anything as long as the state suppresses the bad angels of discrimination with which we, especially the whites, are burdened. And to accomplish this we need to make sure that Billy and Jill grow up in an environment of mirror-fogging equity instead of merit-based equal opportunity in which today DEI (diversity, equity, inclusion) is the chosen form of politically acceptable social environment.
Unfortunately, the realworld is fashioned on quite a different landscape where our capacities have developed differentially. Today diversity is recognized, but in a highly qualified manner and under precisely and politically prescribed circumstances. Diversity that leads to differential capacities to perform, especially in the cognitive areas, is not only rejected but also proscribed in some places by laws that may lead to incarceration. Again, science confirms that in almost all dimensions that describe us we are created unique and develop unequally, and in some dimensions these differences are systemic and cannot be overcome by bending the twig according to the dictates of DEI.
Nationally recognized scholar and political scientist, Harvard/MIT educated Dr Charles Murray, has written an illuminating essay about the extraordinary and special requirements for success in STEM education and subsequent careers. His ‘The Roots of STEM Excellence - Finding and developing one of our rarest and most precious human resources is a paramount goal.’ here in the 30aug24 WSJ will now be vilified by all the usual leftwing suspects bent on reducing America into a second-world country. In this piece he continues reporting on research that established the human diversities we reported on in his previous work Facing Reality: Two Truths about Race in America (2021) which was equally attacked and rejected by the Left. (more here) (I wrote a Union column on it at the time which could not be printed for reasons its then publisher took great pains to explain to me over one of our lunches.)
The basic thesis Murray presents is that success in STEM requires cognitive abilities that are relatively very uncommon. The cognitive abilities demanded are present in only the top 0.01% or one in 10,000 people – it’s just the way the cognitive cookie crumbles. The bottom line is that just being dedicated and working hard will not cut it as it does for almost all other professional pursuits. It’s the equivalent of not being able to make it in the NBA if you’re short or in the NFL if you’re skinny and slow. Not everyone has what it takes to make it in any desired career – the playing field is not level, and it was ever thus. This is diametrically contra to what is told to our K-12 students in progressive public schools.
To nail the point and outline the problem, I will quote some paragraphs from the cited essay by Charles Murray.
The task is to identify those with STEM talent when they are young. The good news is that standardized tests expressly designed to measure cognitive ability are an efficient way to do so. They are accurate, inexpensive, resistant to coaching and demonstrably unbiased against minorities, women or the poor. Those conclusions about the best cognitive tests are among the most exhaustively examined and replicated findings in all social science.
The bad news is that admissions offices of elite universities ignore this evidence. They use “holistic” admissions algorithms that treat tested cognitive ability as just one of many desirable traits. That isn’t necessarily an educational disaster for the next generation of brilliant performers in the social sciences, humanities and nonacademic majors. They can develop their potential in an ordinary college or even without college. The STEM fields are different, for two reasons.
First, the raw cognitive demands are greater in STEM than other disciplines. People who are merely in the top few percentiles of overall cognitive ability don’t face insuperable obstacles in rising to the top of non-STEM fields given enough determination and hard work. Nothing in their college courses is impossible for them to learn if they try hard enough. That’s not true in STEM. Much of the advanced math required for performance at the top of STEM fields is literally impossible to learn for anyone without math ability deep into the top percentile. Determination and hard work can’t compensate.
Dumbing Down Denied (updated 28apr24)
George Rebane
For years RR and its more enlightened readers have lamented and documented the degradation of our public schools and also of our higher educational institutions. Over the last half century this decline has been relentless and extensively reported as anti-American socialists of all shades adopted policies and curricula designed to produce a workforce of diminishing value to our employers and benefit to our society.
Today with the woke movement the state of our education has reached new depths of idiocy. Based on utter nonsense, school curricula are being removed, downgraded, restructured in order to eliminate what the Left says is our country’s ‘structural racism’ promoted by cadres of ‘white supremacists’. These are identified primarily as whites of European descent who are now irredeemably racist, sexist, homophobic, …, the list goes on.
Apropos to this I refer to the latest op-ed, ‘Any learning loss recovery at local high schools?’, by my sweetie-pie Jo Ann. Her piece in the 22mar24 Union (here) cited chapter and verse of the dismal numbers that document the downfall of our local public education system. Since its publication the column has drawn a continuous stream of ire from our local leftwing loonies who also demonstrate their lack of prowess with the written word. The initial criticisms were of Jo Ann’s purported attack on the incompetence of the teachers. She did not single out teachers, but identifying the public school districts as part of the culprits hit close to home, and brought out the defense of the obviously weak component of our public education. In that me thinks their ample protests are revealingly welcome.
To date these rebuttals have come in the form of the newspaper’s Other Voices columns, Hits & Misses entries, and Letters to the Editor. This morning I was reminded of the Left’s desperate denial of this travesty by yet another letter to the editor, this time by one of our more prominent local Marxist worthies (here). This time the criticism was not of Jo Ann’s quoted performance statistics, or of their perceived unfair umbrage against teachers, but the accusation that only rabid rightwing MAGA Republicans would dare point out such a devastating and divisive national deficiency. The politically correct response to this ongoing educational tragedy and its long term impact on our workforce should instead be a prudent silence.
[28apr24 update] I note the almost complete lack of interest in the dumbing down of the nation’s electorate. It seems as if no one cares or is aware that it all starts with an ignorant horde of voters as our Founders feared and Bryan Caplan -The Myth of the Rational Voter: Why Democracies Choose Bad Policies (here) - pointed out several years ago and RR has argued forever. It is such voters who believe the politicians’ bullshit about the economy, how government can spend money better that they can, and how the rich are taking it away from the poor. And perusing the news confirms that people really like to focus on the knock-on and silly ephemeral impacts of national dumbth. I suppose the readers of this little blog just reflect the country’s real interests.
Posted at 11:15 AM in Culture Comments, Nevada County, Our Country, The Liberal Mind | Permalink | Comments (4)
Reblog (0) | |